2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 MCC ForTwo
To start off, both 2005 MCC Crossblade and 2005 MCC ForTwo were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 14 kg more than 2005 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2005 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | MCC | MCC |
Model | Crossblade | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |