2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Hardbody | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 240 Nm |
