2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2011 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1149 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Silverado.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Silverado (515 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2011 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | Commander | Silverado |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 5998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 6580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 4250 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |