2008 Renault Clio vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S60 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | S60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2524 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.7 seconds | 7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |