1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (157 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 295 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Talbot | Toyota |
| Model | Baby | Camry |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2360 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2730 mm |
