1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2011 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler Voyager (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 940 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler Voyager (359 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Triumph | Chrysler |
Model | 2000 | Voyager |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1999 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |