1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Peugeot 306
To start off, 1996 Peugeot 306 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 306. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 306. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Peugeot 306 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Peugeot 306 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Peugeot 306 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Peugeot 306 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Cosmo | 306 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1587 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |