1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 681 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Zastava | Volvo |
| Model | 102 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2639 mm |
