1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Toyota Prius
To start off, 2011 Toyota Prius is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Prius (134 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Prius should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Prius weights approximately 440 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Prius (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Prius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Toyota Prius | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Prius |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1745 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |